I should be studying for exams but once again, I find myself procrastinating.
So I bring you mix of mini summaries, reviews - let's be honest; with ramblings would be the most accurate word.
Movie: XXY directed by Lucía Puenzo. I believe the title refers to a genetic condition in males. It's an independent, Argentine film and it's won many awards I believe. Does it deserve all of them? In some respects, the movie did handle the topic in a rather in-your-face manner. Did it truly represent hermaphrodites and their struggle? Maybe some one but I don't think movies can ever do an issue justice anyway.
The story is about Alex who was born a hermaphrodite and is currently at a decision on whether to choose a particular gender or not, a lot pressure on a 15 year old. Her parents take her to a remote seaside town in order to "avoid the opinion of more idiots" as her mother puts it, and also to avoid persecution 'as a monster'. The movies doesn't really have a plot as it centers around Alex's struggle with her condition. Interestingly, she is referred to as 'she' even though she has stopped taking the medical to feminine her. The actor Inés Efron played the part of an androgynous lanky youth quite effectively who is not sure about her sexuality. I was really impressed by her.
To sum it up, Alex's mother invites some friends over for a visit, it seems innocent at first unless you find out that one of the family friends is a plastic surgeon. Alex falls for his son, Alvaro and they have sex (by Alex's request)- except in a twist, the Alex penetrates him anally and Alvaro ends up liking it and propositions again her later in the movie which leads him to wonder if he is gay- another aspect of the film that is left ambiguous (as well as Alex's choice at the end- currently her mother is pushing her to be female).
Later on, 3 boys from the village more or less sexually assault Alex and pull down her pants to have a look at her genitals, quite a scary experience which is interrupted. In the end, Alex takes the hard road by refusing hormones or an operation but just before the guests leave, Alvaro says he loves Alex to which she replies that 'he's looking for something else'. So everything is left rather ambiguous in regards to Alex's and Alvaro's sexuality. I do believe that Alvaro's father (the plastic surgeon, is homophobic which is going to make it hard for Alvaro if he needs to come out of the closet any time soon).
Alex was an entertaining character, often quite temperamental and impetuous. The film didn't really utilize the beaches- why is the colour always grayish and stormy? Alex's father who is a very understanding character wasn't fleshed out enough, he spends too much time looking moody and there wasn't even much reaction when he discovered Alex and Alvaro having sex. She IS only 15 after all.
However the movie was gripping, very sensuous in some places, you could feel the sexual tension and I enjoyed it, it made me think. It's low budget but it didn't get me the way the King and the Clown did or the Masseur did even given it's subject.
Movie: Holding Trevor. Basically about a homosexual guy named Trevor and the issues he faces with not going anywhere in his life as a screen writer, dealing with an ex-boyfriend who is a drug addict and forging a new, health relationship with a medical intern.
Once again, the movie doesn't have much plot but there's a kind of dark, cynical humor that Trevor has which made the movie more enjoyable. He spouts some pretty deep advice and self analysis that any audience member could relate to, especially when dealing with his career and his ex-boyfriend (who dies by the way). The main problem with this movie is that it's not outstanding, I can't decide if it's averagely outstanding or outstandingly average. There are parts where you laugh, nod in relation and feel like you can really relate to Trevor but you walk away without the buzz of having seen an excellent movie. It's just good. I think it faces the same problems as XXY, it's trying to capture an emotional process on a visual medium but it doesn't quite get there. I would still recommend that people watch it though, particularly because what could have been a generic gay romance flick is turned into something a bit more real which in itself is an achievement. The fact that he's gay seems very normal and any heterosexual person could also face the issues that Trevor would face.
Book: The God Eaters. I've been looking forward to this one, I read it online and then I gulped the book down as if I'd never read it when the hardcopy arrived.
http://chartreuse.studiowhippingboy.com/g_e_contents.html - Entire book, word for word.
It was entertaining to say the least, I really loved some of the humor
" Ash remembered yesterday's effort to remain calm despite the sight of Kieran naked, and the thought threw him off his stride, but he tried to keep up the bantering tone. "You think if I change my last name they'll let me in the bath before the water's brown?"
"If that worked, we'd all be named 'Aaaaaa.' I'm surprised we get to bathe at all. Water's expensive around here." "Keiran can be funny as well as Ash who starts out a sniveling wreck but finds a lot of emotional strength and backbone as the novel progress and as Ash gets tougher, Keiran gets softer. In that respect it has a lot of romance novel qualities about it but I could enjoy it because of the well written character interactions and how the romance develops.
This actually has a plot from everything persecution on Native Americans by the Commonwealth as well as it's spiritual aspects in how god wars against each other, not similar but kind comparable to Jennifer Fallon's Medalon trilogy, only here certain individuals are borne with 'Talents' such as Kinetics or Empathy rather than 'MAAAJICK', however the multitasking abilities of Ash and Keiran sometimes put that to question, especially towards the end. Also homosexuals or 'inverts' are persecute under the religion of the Commonwealth which of course is enforced upon the conquered nation but that becomes a little lost in the romance between Keiran and Ashes - that's one of my nitpicks. It turned from a sci-fi/fantasy with romance to a romance with sci-fi/fantasy a little towards the end. I still enjoyed the book to my very great and pleasant surprise probably because the pace picked up considerable.
During the start of the novel, it is about their imprisonment and subsequent escape and their relationship is at it's founding stages, plagued with insecurities of "Am I good enough for him?". When their romance is mostly cemented the action picked up quite a bit which helps to from becoming too sappy (a risk at some points), you feel like the characters are getting out of character even considering 'character development'.
Some of these plot elements aren't unique but the way they are woven together makes the novel unique, it's like western meets romance meets modern fantasy meets historical commentary. I like how the characters aren't perfect but they don't let circumstances hamper them especially when they work together.
My only other nitpick is that sometimes the smart guy - Ash sounds uneducated and sometimes Keiran sounds too smart of hardened killer/assassin/whore/self educated individual- I'm talking in terms of vocabulary because they are both smart characters in their own way.
Some of the elements are a little too convince, especially the supposed charisma of both of them but that's mostly at the start of the novel and fades off.
Otherwise, I REALLY liked this novel, it was a gripping and highly enjoyable read and there'd better be more! An excellent book for a debut author!
Here's summary from one of my favourite websites:
http://unique.logophilos.net/?p=432I don't agree with that reviewer in regards to the perspective changes, probably because I love Sarah Monette and her style is distinctive in that she alternates between two main characters, sometimes three as well. George R Martin also does that with great effect so it didn't bother me at all. I think a sign of a good author is being able to handle the perspectives of many different characters because it adds a complexity and depth. That's a saving point in God Eaters because the characters themselves are kind of stereotypes and therefore run the risk of become 2 dimensional.
I believe that even though this book is available free, it's definitely worth getting it in hardback. I could reread for quite a while!
DVD: Ansuya Lavish Layer Vol 2- For those not interested in bellydance, scroll down.
Ansuya has always been one of my favourite performers but not my favourite teacher. She's good but something gets lost in translation in a video vs her in real life. Lavish Layers Vol 2 was slightly harder but not that much harder. Sometimes the background music was too loud and you couldn't hear Ansuya properly and sometimes it was too soft but it never matched the moves you were doing :S That said, her demonstrations are excellent and her explanations are decent. There was sometimes about Rania's performances I hated but her instruction was good -maybe because she is also a fitness instructor but for Ansuya, I'd rather buy her performance videos and attend her workshops than buy her instructional videos.
News: Yes Barrack Obama won. Not surprised but only time will tell. It was interesting to see footage of people crying in joy at his victory. He is definitely charismatic, something which Bush isn't. I just wonder how much he's controlled by the Democrats and how calculating and manipulative as a leader he is.
It's interesting what this article says:
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24606890-5018194,00.html“In a lot of ways they are very similar characters, comfortable with details and with a problem-solving mentality,” Professor Garrett says of Mr Rudd and Senator Obama.Wouldn't you want that in all leaders?
So:
http://www.news-medical.net/?id=42430 "According to new research from the Australian National University (ANU), marriages where the woman is better educated than the man are more likely to end in divorce."
They say this may reflect two factors - educated women may be more financially independent and more able to support themselves outside of the marriage, removing a potential barrier to divorce or separation - and also such couples may experience greater conflict or dissatisfaction within the relationship, possibly because they are not adhering to the traditional gendered roles within marriage.
On the other hand the researchers found that couples with the opposite pattern of educational attainment - where the man had the tertiary qualifications and the woman did not complete high school - were not so likely to split up and were if anything more stable.HOWEVER:
The study found the lowest rate of separation was among couples where both partners reported tertiary qualificationsWell good- at least the article doesn't say "Well the best way to decrease divorce rates is to deny women education".
I think it's a stereotype but uneducated men tend to be more easy to tell than a uneducated woman. Divorce isn't necessary a bad thing but it's just like the unemployment rate- there needs to be some divorce in society so that people aren't stuck in unhappy marriages BUT the rates shouldn't too high. By marriage I also extend that definition to de facto and homosexual unions.
It interesting the notes about how adhering to gender roles help in marriages where there is an education disparity. I don't think it's healthy personally, but the success of a marriage isn't always measured by happiness or achievements of particular partners.